Preventing rental arrears starts long before a tenant moves into a property. One of the most effective ways to reduce the risk of missed rental payments is to carry out thorough tenant screening. Selecting a financially stable and reliable tenant is far less costly than trying to recover unpaid rent through legal action.
This lesson explains how to assess a prospective tenant’s ability to pay rent by conducting credit checks, verifying employment and income, checking references, and identifying warning signs that may indicate a higher risk of future rental arrears.
By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:
Why Tenant Screening Matters
Every landlord hopes to secure a reliable tenant who pays rent on time and looks after the property.
Proper screening helps landlords:
Good tenant selection is one of the most effective forms of risk management.
The Tenant Screening Process
A professional screening process usually includes:
Each part of the process provides valuable information about the applicant.
Credit Checks
A credit check provides insight into an applicant’s financial history and ability to manage debt.
A credit report may include:
While a poor credit record does not automatically mean an applicant will fail to pay rent, it may indicate increased financial risk.
Landlords should assess the overall financial picture rather than relying solely on a credit score.
Consider factors such as:
Patterns are often more important than isolated incidents.
Employment Verification
Stable employment generally provides greater confidence that a tenant will be able to meet their rental obligations.
Employment verification may include:
Verification should be carried out directly with the employer wherever possible.
Self-Employed Applicants
Self-employed applicants should provide evidence that demonstrates consistent income.
Examples include:
Additional evidence may be appropriate depending on the circumstances.
Income Assessments
A tenant may have stable employment but still be unable to afford the rent.
An affordability assessment helps determine whether the rental is realistic based on the applicant’s income and financial commitments.
Many landlords use a guideline that rent should not exceed approximately 30% to 35% of the tenant’s gross monthly income. This is a common affordability benchmark rather than a legal requirement, and individual circumstances should always be considered.
Example
Monthly gross income: R30,000
Maximum recommended rent (approximately 30–35%):
If the monthly rent is R16,000, the applicant may face financial pressure unless there are additional sources of income.
Assessing Monthly Financial Commitments
When reviewing affordability, landlords should also consider:
A tenant with high existing debt may struggle even if they have a reasonable salary.
Reference Checks
Previous landlords can provide valuable information about an applicant’s rental history.
Questions may include:
References should ideally be obtained directly from previous landlords or managing agents.
Personal References
Personal references may provide useful background information, but they should not replace landlord or employment references.
Where possible, greater weight should be given to independent, verifiable references.
Certain factors may indicate a greater likelihood of future rental arrears.
Examples include:
One warning sign does not necessarily mean an applicant should be rejected, but several combined may indicate a higher level of risk.
Red Flags During the Application Process
Landlords should investigate further if an applicant:
Professional screening helps reduce unnecessary risk.
Using Guarantors or Sureties
Where an applicant presents some financial risk but is otherwise suitable, a landlord may consider requesting a guarantor or surety.
A guarantor agrees to accept responsibility for the tenant’s financial obligations if the tenant fails to pay rent, subject to the terms of the guarantee or suretyship.
The guarantor should also undergo appropriate financial checks before being accepted.
Fair and Consistent Screening
All applicants should be assessed using the same objective criteria.
Landlords should:
Consistency helps reduce disputes and demonstrates professional management.
Professional landlords should always: